Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robin Heath

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 18:06, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Robin Heath (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet WP:NACADEMIC. Is more known as author on culture and pseudoscientific topics, but still does not appear to meet WP:NAUTHOR or WP:NBIO. Please also see this 2014 thread. Sourcing is also suboptimal. —PaleoNeonate08:05, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. —PaleoNeonate08:13, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:29, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. XOR'easter (talk) 21:05, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Clearly doesn't meet WP:NPROF; I thought he might pass WP:NAUTHOR on account of all the books he's authored, but going through them they are mostly self-published (Bluestone Press seems to be his own company, the only mention I can find of it is on his own personal website - don't be confused by BlueStone Press, a local news site in Northern Ireland), and even the ones that were published by another company have received zero reviews in any non-UGC mainstream sources. Can't see coverage of the man himself to meet WP:NBIO, so delete. GirthSummit (blether) 10:37, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.